2023
Quick information
Type Seminar
Date March 24, 2023 - 11:00
Time 11:00
Location Guest House, GANIL, Caen | France
Share this event
More events
Conference
October 14 > 16, 2024
Ganil Community Meeting 2024
GANIL, Caen | France
Conference
October 06 > 11, 2024
PhyNuBE
GANIL, Caen | France
Conference
September 09 > 13, 2024
NUSYM24
GANIL, Caen | France

Stepping towards the island of stability

Rikel Chakma (GANIL, France)

The superheavy nuclei (SHN, with atomic number Z >= 104) exist entirely because of the shell effects. In the classical liquid-drop model, these nuclei would fission spontaneously due to their large electric charge. The shell effects create a fission barrier, nonexistent in the liquid-drop picture, guaranteeing their survival. The stabilizing effects of the nuclear shells also imply the existence of very long-lived superheavy nuclei with large proton and neutron numbers where these effects are stronger. This region of enhanced stability is called the island of stability. However, the position of this island is not certain as different nuclear models predict differently. Macroscopic-microscopic models (using Nilsson, Woods-Saxon, or folded Yukawa potentials) predict the center to be at Z = 114, N = 184 [1,2] while the self-consistent models using Skyrme, Gogny, or relativistic mean field effective nuclear interactions predict it to be at Z = 120, 124, 126 and N = 172, 184 [3–6], depending on the parametrization used in the calculations. The SHN are normally produced in fusion-evaporation reactions with very low production cross sections (≈ 10 nb in the A = 250 region). The cross section diminishes even more as a function of atomic number [7]. As a result, the available spectroscopic data in the transfermium region are still rather scarce [8]. Performing detailed spectroscopy in the lighter transfermium region is thus more pragmatic and one step closer to understanding the properties of the SHN. To refine the theoretical models, their predictions can then be compared against detailed spectroscopic information on these nuclei. One such viable experimental approach is to search for and study low-lying metastable states, since their decay properties depend on the nature of the states available at the Fermi surface. In the A = 250 region, high K isomers have been identified in several isotopes. We performed an experiment to investigate the presence of high K isomers in 255Rf using the GABRIELA [9] setup at the focal plane of SHELS [10] separator at the FLNR facility in Dubna. In this seminar, I will first present the results concerning the three isomeric states observed in 255Rf and also its α-decay to 251No. In the second part of the talk, I will discuss about our attempts to study the excited states in 252Fm nuclei at the Argonne National Laboratory using the FMA [11] recoil separator and the GRETINA [12] gamma-ray detector array. 252Fm being deformed and doubly-magic makes it a very interesting case to investigate the effects of shell closure on nuclear structure. In the third part of the talk, I will present the current status of the SIRIUS (Spectroscopy and Identification of Rare Isotopes Using S3) [3] detector array which will be placed at the focal plane of S3 (Super Separator Spectrometer) [14] to study rare isotopes like superheavy and exotic nuclei far from the stability with very low production cross-sections.

References
[1]S. G. Nilsson et al., Nucl. Phys. A 131, 1 (1969).
[2] R. R. Chasman et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 833 (1977).
[3] S. Ćwiok et al., Nucl. Phys. A 611, 211 (1996).
[4] K. Rutz et al., Phys. Rev. C 56, 238 (1997).
[5] M. Bender et al., Phys. Rev. C 60, 034304 (1999)
[6] A. T. Kruppa et al., Phys. Rev. C 61, 034313 (2000).
[7] S. Hofmann et al., Pure. Appl. Chem. 90, 1773 (2018).
[8] C. Theisen et al., Nucl. Phys. A 944, 333 (2015).
[9] R. Chakma et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 245 (2020).
[10] A. G. Popeko et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 376, 140 (2016).
[11] C. N. Davids et al., Nucl. Instru. Meth. B 70, 358 (1992).
[12] S. Paschalis et al., Nucl. Instru. Meth. A 709, 44 (2013).
[13] N. Karkour et al., IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium 51 1 (2016).
[14] F. Déchery et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 66 (2015).